Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾Ö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »çÀüÁö½ÄÀÌ ÃʱâÄ¡·á¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

The Effects of Established-Knowledge of Temporomandibular Disorders on Initial Treatment

´ëÇѱ¸°­³»°úÇÐȸÁö 2008³â 33±Ç 1È£ p.75 ~ 83
¿Á½ÂÁØ, ÅÂÀÏÈ£, °í¸í¿¬, ¾È¿ë¿ì, ¼­ºÀÁ÷,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¿Á½ÂÁØ ( Ok Seung-Joon ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­³»°úÇб³½Ç
ÅÂÀÏÈ£ ( Tae Il-Ho ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­³»°úÇб³½Ç
°í¸í¿¬ ( Ko Myung-Yun ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­³»°úÇб³½Ç
¾È¿ë¿ì ( An Yong-U ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­³»°úÇб³½Ç
¼­ºÀÁ÷ ( Suh Bong-Jik ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­³»°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾ÖÀÇ ±â¿©¿äÀÎ Áß ÀÎÁö¿äÀÎÀÌ È¯ÀÚÃʱâÄ¡·á¿¡ ¾î¶² ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖ´ÂÁö ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇØ 2007³â 6¿ù¿¡¼­ 8¿ù±îÁö ºÎ»ê´ëÇк´¿ø ±¸°­³»°ú¸¦ ÃÊÁø ¹æ¹®ÇÏ¿© ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾Ö·Î Áø´Ü¹ÞÀº 178¸í¿¡°Ô ÀÚü Á¦ÀÛÇÑ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ±× Áß ¸ðµç ¹®Ç׿¡ ´ëÇØ ¼º½ÇÈ÷ ´äÀ» ±âÀÔÇÑ 120¸íÀÇ ¼³¹®Áö¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î Á¡¼ö¿¡ µû¸¥ Â÷À̸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´°í, À̸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î Áúȯ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌÇصµ°¡ ÃʱâÄ¡·á¿¡ ¾î¶°ÇÑ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖ´ÂÁö ¾Ë¾Æº¸¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ±× °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù.
1. Àü¹®´ëÀçÇÐÀÌ»óÀÇ ÇзÂÀ» Áö´Ñ ȯÀÚµéÀÌ °íÁ¹ ÀÌÇÏÀÇ ÇзÂÀ» Áö´Ñ ȯÀڵ麸´Ù Áúȯ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌÇصµ°¡ ³ôÀº °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù(P=0.129).
2. Àü¹®´ëÀçÇÐÀÌ»óÀÇ ÇзÂÀ» Áö´Ñ ȯÀÚµéÀÇ °íµæÁ¡ÀÚ ºñÀ²ÀÌ °íÁ¹ÀÌÇÏÀÇ ÇзÂÀ» Áö´Ñ ȯÀÚ±º¿¡¼­ º¸´Ù ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù(p=0.098)
3. Æò±ÕÁ¡¼ö À̻󱺰ú ÀÌÇϱº¿¡¼­ ƯÁø¼±ÅÃÀ², LDC(local dental clinic)¼±¹æ¹®À², ÃʱâÄ¡·áÈÄ Àç³»¿øÀ²¿¡ À־ÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â °üÂûµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
4. Àç³»¿ø ȯÀÚÁß Áõ»óÀÌ °³¼±µÇÁö ¾ÊÀº ±º¿¡¼­ Àü¹®´ë ÀçÇÐÀÌ»óÀÇ ÇзÂÀ» Áö´Ñ »ç¶÷ÀÌ ¸¹¾ÒÀ¸¸ç (p=0.005), ƯÁøÀÇ»ç ¼±ÅÃÀ²(p=0.101), LDC ¼±¹æ¹®À²(p=0.107) ¶ÇÇÑ ³ôÀº °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù.
5. Áõ»óÀÌ °³¼±µÇÁö ¾ÊÀº ȯÀÚµé Áß Àü¹®´ë ÀçÇÐÀÌ»óÀÇ ÇзÂÀ» Áö´Ñ »ç¶÷ÀÇ ºñÀ²ÀÌ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³­ °ÍÀº, Áúȯ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌÇصµ°¡ Áõ»óÀÇ °³¼±°ú Á÷Á¢ÀûÀ¸·Î ¿¬°üµÇ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó´Â ÃßÃøÀ» °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô Çϸç ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾ÖÀÇ º¹À⼺À» ÀçÈ®ÀνÃÄÑ ÁÖ¾ú´Ù.

There was a research to make it sure that among the contributing factors, the cognitive factor affects on TMD(temporomandibular disorders) or not, we used a questionnaire on new TMD patients who visited the Department of Oral Medicine at Pusan National University of Hospital(PNUH). Research was to identify the patients¡¯ understanding of the TMD. 120 patients who visited PNUH from 2007 June to August were tested and following are the results.
1. Those who were in Jr. college or had higher scholarship showed higher understanding than those with final graduation of high school or had lower scholarship(p=0.129).
2. Percentage of high scorers (score of 16¢¦20) were in Jr. college or had higher scholarship than those with final graduation of high school or had lower scholarship(p=0.098).
3. Both in those who scored higher than average and in those scored lower than average, there was no difference in the rate of previsit to local dental clinic, selection of special treatment(by professor), and attendance to next visit after their conservative treatment.
4. Patients who claimed that their symptom did not change after conservative treatment showed higher rate of pre-visit to local dentist(p=0.107) and selection of special treatment(by professor)(p=0.101) and many of them were in Jr. college or had higher scholarship(p=0.005).
5. The fact the patients who claimed their symptoms did not changed or got worsen had a tendency of higher scholarship showed that understanding of the TMD has little to do with the improvement of symptom and that TMD is a very complicated disease.

Å°¿öµå

±â¿©¿äÀÎ;ÀÎÁö¿äÀÎ;ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾Ö
Contributing factor;Cognitive factor;TMD

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI